Minnesota legislators are considering a school-restroom mandate that has drawn attention from parents and taxpayers in Dayton’s Bluff.
Alpha News reported that the proposal applies broadly to student restrooms rather than limiting the products to bathrooms designated for female students.
Rep. Dean Urdahl proposed specifying that the products be placed in restrooms used by female students, calling the change practical and focused on those most likely to use them. The DFL-controlled committee rejected his amendment.
Bill sponsor Rep. Sandra Feist opposed that limitation. She said schools are increasingly using gender-neutral bathrooms and stated that “not all students who menstruate are female.” Feist also said the anticipated usage by non-female students had been included in the cost estimate.
Feist said the proposal would be financed through a $2-per-pupil increase in each district’s operating-capital revenue. She argued that absenteeism caused by lack of access costs more than providing the products.
For Dayton’s Bluff, the central questions are whether the statewide mandate is appropriately designed, whether its cost estimate is realistic, and how local schools would implement it.
Article Source: Alpha News: “DFL legislators want menstrual products in boys’ bathrooms”
